↓ Skip to main content

EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
215 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, July 2023
DOI 10.1136/ard-2023-224416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis Parodis, Charlotte Girard-Guyonvarc’h, Laurent Arnaud, Oliver Distler, Andrea Domján, Cornelia H M Van den Ende, Kim Fligelstone, Agnes Kocher, Maddalena Larosa, Martin Lau, Alexandros Mitropoulos, Mwidimi Ndosi, Janet L Poole, Anthony Redmond, Valentin Ritschl, Helene Alexanderson, Yvonne Sjöberg, Gunilla von Perner, Till Uhlig, Cecilia Varju, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Elisabet Welin, René Westhovens, Tanja A Stamm, Carina Boström

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 215 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 14 13%
Other 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 50 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 20%
Unspecified 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 52 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2024.
All research outputs
#251,088
of 26,808,431 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#89
of 7,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,204
of 378,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,808,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.