↓ Skip to main content

Atmospheric Methane: Comparison Between Methane's Record in 2006–2022 and During Glacial Terminations

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,871)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
699 X users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atmospheric Methane: Comparison Between Methane's Record in 2006–2022 and During Glacial Terminations
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, July 2023
DOI 10.1029/2023gb007875
Authors

Euan G. Nisbet, Martin R. Manning, Ed J. Dlugokencky, Sylvia Englund Michel, Xin Lan, Thomas Röckmann, Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon, Jochen Schmitt, Paul I. Palmer, Michael N. Dyonisius, Youmi Oh, Rebecca E. Fisher, David Lowry, James L. France, James W. C. White, Gordon Brailsford, Tony Bromley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 699 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 25%
Environmental Science 7 22%
Chemistry 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 769. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2024.
All research outputs
#26,376
of 26,160,558 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#2
of 1,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#638
of 365,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,160,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.