↓ Skip to main content

Hormone replacement therapy for women with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hormone replacement therapy for women with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008613.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liz Mackay, Lynn Kilbride, Karen A Adamson, John Chisholm

Abstract

There is conflicting information about the impact of the menopause on glycaemic control amongst women with type 1 diabetes. Some menopausal women with type 1 diabetes are treated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) but the effects of this treatment have, to date, not been established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 35 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,584,414
of 19,047,010 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,749
of 11,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,315
of 168,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,047,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.