↓ Skip to main content

Hormone replacement therapy for women with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hormone replacement therapy for women with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008613.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liz Mackay, Lynn Kilbride, Karen A Adamson, John Chisholm

Abstract

There is conflicting information about the impact of the menopause on glycaemic control amongst women with type 1 diabetes. Some menopausal women with type 1 diabetes are treated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) but the effects of this treatment have, to date, not been established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
India 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Unspecified 8 9%
Other 31 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Unspecified 10 11%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,773,030
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,897
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,549
of 148,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.