↓ Skip to main content

When to use which molecular prognostic scoring system in the management of patients with MDS?

Overview of attention for article published in Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Haematology, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When to use which molecular prognostic scoring system in the management of patients with MDS?
Published in
Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Haematology, October 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.beha.2023.101517
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tariq Kewan, Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Carmelo Gurnari, Zhuoer Xie, Maximilian Stahl, Amer M Zeidan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,031,137
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Haematology
#83
of 613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,598
of 368,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Haematology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.