↓ Skip to main content

Adhesion-GPCRs structure to function

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Adhesion-GPCRs in the CNS.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Adhesion-GPCRs in the CNS.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Adhesion-GPCRs
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7913-1_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4419-7912-4, 978-1-4419-7913-1
Authors

Strokes N, Piao X, Natalie Strokes, Xianhua Piao, Strokes, Natalie, Piao, Xianhua

Abstract

There are a total of 33 members of adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in humans and 30 members in mice and rats. More than half of these receptors are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS), indicating their possible roles in the development and function of the CNS. Indeed, it has been shown that adhesion-GPCRs are involved in the regulation of neurulation, cortical development and neurite growth. Among the few adhesion-GPCRs being studied, GPR56 is so far the only member associated with a human brain malformation called bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria (BFPP). The histopathology of BFPP is a cobblestone-like brain malformation characterized by neuronal overmigration through a breached pial basement membrane (BM). Further studies in the Gpr56 knockout mouse model revealed that GPR56 is expressed in radial glial cells and regulates the integrity of the pial BM by binding a putative ligand in the extracellular matrix of the developing brain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,227
of 4,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,416
of 163,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#23
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.