The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mechanical characteristics of reclaimed carbon fibre under superheated steam atmosphere and its feasibility for remanufacturing CFRP/CFRTP
|
---|---|
Published in |
Composites: Part A, Applied Science & Manufacturing, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107843 |
Authors |
K. Obunai, K. Okubo |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 1 | 10% |
Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#995,637
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Composites: Part A, Applied Science & Manufacturing
#4
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,344
of 373,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Composites: Part A, Applied Science & Manufacturing
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.