You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Parietal function in good and poor readers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral and Brain Functions, August 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-9081-2-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin Laycock, Sheila G. Crewther, Patricia M. Kiely, David P. Crewther |
| Abstract |
While there are many psychophysical reports of impaired magnocellular pathway function in developmental dyslexia (DD), few have investigated parietal function, the major projection of this pathway, in good and poor readers closely matched for nonverbal intelligence. In view of new feedforward-feedback theories of visual processing, impaired magnocellular function raises the question of whether all visually-driven functions or only those associated with parietal cortex functions are equally impaired and if so, whether parietal performance is more closely related to general ability levels than reading ability. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,024
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#333
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,227
of 65,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.