↓ Skip to main content

Stroke prevention by percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stroke prevention by percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Heart, June 2013
DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304394
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathias Wolfrum, Georg M Froehlich, Guido Knapp, Leanne K Casaubon, James J DiNicolantonio, Alexandra J Lansky, Pascal Meier

Abstract

The role of percutaneous closure of patent foramen oval (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke has been very controversial for years due to a lack of clear evidence.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Librarian 4 5%
Other 21 29%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 53%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2013.
All research outputs
#2,726,213
of 26,495,046 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#1,407
of 6,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,963
of 211,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#11
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,495,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.