↓ Skip to main content

Digital pathology for reporting histopathology samples, including cancer screening samples – definitive evidence from a multisite study

Overview of attention for article published in Histopathology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 3,513)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digital pathology for reporting histopathology samples, including cancer screening samples – definitive evidence from a multisite study
Published in
Histopathology, January 2024
DOI 10.1111/his.15129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayesha S Azam, Yee‐Wah Tsang, Jenny Thirlwall, Peter K Kimani, Shatrughan Sah, Kishore Gopalakrishnan, Clinton Boyd, Maurice B Loughrey, Paul J Kelly, David P Boyle, Manuel Salto‐Tellez, David Clark, Ian O Ellis, Mohammad Ilyas, Emad Rakha, Adam Bickers, Ian S D Roberts, Maria F Soares, Desley A H Neil, Abi Takyi, Sinthuri Raveendran, Emily Hero, Harriet Evans, Rania Osman, Khunsha Fatima, Rhian W Hughes, Stuart A McIntosh, Gordon W Moran, Jacobo Ortiz‐Fernandez‐Sordo, Nasir M Rajpoot, Ben Storey, Imtiaz Ahmed, Janet A Dunn, Louise Hiller, David R J Snead

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#493,682
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#7
of 3,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,215
of 258,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.