↓ Skip to main content

Ethical and Clinical Considerations in the Use of Hydroxyurea in Pregnant Women with Sickle Cell Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Hemoglobin, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethical and Clinical Considerations in the Use of Hydroxyurea in Pregnant Women with Sickle Cell Disease
Published in
Hemoglobin, February 2024
DOI 10.1080/03630269.2024.2310283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gayatri Desai, Kapilkumar Dave, Sumeet Devare, Shrey Desai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,023,208
of 25,339,932 outputs
Outputs from Hemoglobin
#164
of 461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,488
of 165,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hemoglobin
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,339,932 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them