The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of the Coordinated Return to Work model after orthopaedic surgery for lumbar discectomy and hip and knee arthroplasty: a register-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Occupational and environmental medicine, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1136/oemed-2023-109276 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Piia Lavikainen, Jari Heiskanen, Kari Jalkanen, Aku-Ville Lehtimäki, Saara Vehkala, Pauliina Kangas, Kaj Husman, Ilkka Vohlonen, Janne Martikainen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,577,705
of 26,248,133 outputs
Outputs from Occupational and environmental medicine
#2,425
of 4,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,250
of 374,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Occupational and environmental medicine
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,248,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.