The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enhanced Postsurgical Cancer Treatment Using Methacrylated Glycol Chitosan Hydrogel for Sustained DNA/Doxorubicin Delivery and Immunotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biomaterials Research, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.34133/bmr.0008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hee Seung Seo, Jun-Hyeok Han, Jaesung Lim, Ga-Hyun Bae, Min Ji Byun, Chi-Pin James Wang, Jieun Han, Juwon Park, Hee Ho Park, Mikyung Shin, Tae-Eun Park, Tae-Hyung Kim, Se-Na Kim, Wooram Park, Chun Gwon Park |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 1 | 33% |
Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,380,468
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials Research
#8
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,509
of 183,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them