↓ Skip to main content

Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 65,048)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
257 news outlets
blogs
15 blogs
twitter
2412 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses
Published in
British Medical Journal, February 2024
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2023-077310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa M Lane, Elizabeth Gamage, Shutong Du, Deborah N Ashtree, Amelia J McGuinness, Sarah Gauci, Phillip Baker, Mark Lawrence, Casey M Rebholz, Bernard Srour, Mathilde Touvier, Felice N Jacka, Adrienne O'Neil, Toby Segasby, Wolfgang Marx

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,412 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 30 16%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Master 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 51 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 33 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 54 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3397. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,759
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#46
of 65,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21
of 328,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 815 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 815 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.