↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with or without stenting in patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancy, prior to surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with or without stenting in patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancy, prior to surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006001.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khalid Mumtaz, Saeed Hamid, Wasim Jafri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 90 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 28 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,427
of 77,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.