You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Genetic Tools for Analysis of FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells In Vivo
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Regulatory T Cells
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61737-979-6_8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61737-978-9, 978-1-61737-979-6
|
| Authors |
Nadia M. Jeremiah, Adrian Liston, Jeremiah, Nadia M., Liston, Adrian |
| Editors |
George Kassiotis, Adrian Liston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 40% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#19,478,123
of 23,954,951 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,336
of 13,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,121
of 186,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#174
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,954,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,536 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.