Chapter title |
Analysis of Protein Phosphorylation and Its Functional Impact on Protein–Protein Interactions via Text Mining of the Scientific Literature
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 10 |
Book title |
Protein Bioinformatics
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6783-4_10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6781-0, 978-1-4939-6783-4
|
Authors |
Qinghua Wang, Karen E. Ross, Hongzhan Huang, Jia Ren, Gang Li, K. Vijay-Shanker, Cathy H. Wu, Cecilia N. Arighi, Wang, Qinghua, Ross, Karen E., Huang, Hongzhan, Ren, Jia, Li, Gang, Vijay-Shanker, K., Wu, Cathy H., Arighi, Cecilia N. |
Editors |
Cathy H. Wu, Cecilia N. Arighi, Karen E. Ross |
Abstract |
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) are one of the main contributors to the diversity of proteoforms in the proteomic landscape. In particular, protein phosphorylation represents an essential regulatory mechanism that plays a role in many biological processes. Protein kinases, the enzymes catalyzing this reaction, are key participants in metabolic and signaling pathways. Their activation or inactivation dictate downstream events: what substrates are modified and their subsequent impact (e.g., activation state, localization, protein-protein interactions (PPIs)). The biomedical literature continues to be the main source of evidence for experimental information about protein phosphorylation. Automatic methods to bring together phosphorylation events and phosphorylation-dependent PPIs can help to summarize the current knowledge and to expose hidden connections. In this chapter, we demonstrate two text mining tools, RLIMS-P and eFIP, for the retrieval and extraction of kinase-substrate-site data and phosphorylation-dependent PPIs from the literature. These tools offer several advantages over a literature search in PubMed as their results are specific for phosphorylation. RLIMS-P and eFIP results can be sorted, organized, and viewed in multiple ways to answer relevant biological questions, and the protein mentions are linked to UniProt identifiers. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 36% |
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 21% |
Computer Science | 2 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |