The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fast and Efficient Root Phenotyping via Pose Estimation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Phenomics, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.34133/plantphenomics.0175 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth M Berrigan, Lin Wang, Hannah Carrillo, Kimberly Echegoyen, Mikayla Kappes, Jorge Torres, Angel Ai-Perreira, Erica McCoy, Emily Shane, Charles D Copeland, Lauren Ragel, Charidimos Georgousakis, Sanghwa Lee, Dawn Reynolds, Avery Talgo, Juan Gonzalez, Ling Zhang, Ashish B Rajurkar, Michel Ruiz, Erin Daniels, Liezl Maree, Shree Pariyar, Wolfgang Busch, Talmo D Pereira |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 23% |
Mexico | 4 | 7% |
India | 3 | 5% |
Canada | 3 | 5% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 27 | 48% |
Members of the public | 27 | 48% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 19% |
Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 31% |
Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 165. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2024.
All research outputs
#267,288
of 26,808,431 outputs
Outputs from Plant Phenomics
#2
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,264
of 354,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Phenomics
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,808,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.