↓ Skip to main content

Postpartum misoprostol for preventing maternal mortality and morbidity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postpartum misoprostol for preventing maternal mortality and morbidity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008982.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Justus Hofmeyr, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Natalia Novikova, Theresa A Lawrie

Abstract

The primary objective of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) prevention and treatment is to reduce maternal deaths. Misoprostol has the major public health advantage over injectable medication that it can more easily be distributed at community level. Because misoprostol might have adverse effects unrelated to blood loss which might impact on mortality or severe morbidity, it is important to continue surveillance of all relevant evidence from randomised trials. This is particularly important as misoprostol is being introduced on a large scale for PPH prevention in low-income countries, and is commonly used for PPH treatment in well-resourced settings as well.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 136 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 25%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Unspecified 18 13%
Researcher 18 13%
Other 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 15%
Unspecified 20 14%
Social Sciences 16 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 13 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#527,364
of 13,122,286 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,683
of 10,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,223
of 151,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,122,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.