The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An improved representative of stomatal models for predicting diurnal stomatal conductance at low irradiance and vapor pressure deficit in tropical rainforest trees
|
---|---|
Published in |
Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110098 |
Authors |
Wei Xue, Xue-min He, Quan Wang, Pei-jun Shi, Guang-hui Lv, Jian-feng Huang, Da Yang, Jiao-lin Zhang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 50% |
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,850,938
of 26,580,681 outputs
Outputs from Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
#117
of 2,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,397
of 305,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,580,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.