↓ Skip to main content

Enacting Decentralized Authority: The Practices and Limits of Moving Beyond Hierarchy

Overview of attention for article published in Administrative Science Quarterly, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enacting Decentralized Authority: The Practices and Limits of Moving Beyond Hierarchy
Published in
Administrative Science Quarterly, June 2024
DOI 10.1177/00018392241257372
Authors

Michael Y. Lee

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 10 37%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Unspecified 3 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2024.
All research outputs
#2,686,718
of 26,476,278 outputs
Outputs from Administrative Science Quarterly
#318
of 1,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,290
of 312,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administrative Science Quarterly
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,476,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them