↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an individualised, progressive walking and education intervention for the prevention of low back pain recurrence in Australia (WalkBack): a randomised…

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
442 news outlets
blogs
17 blogs
twitter
726 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an individualised, progressive walking and education intervention for the prevention of low back pain recurrence in Australia (WalkBack): a randomised controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, June 2024
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00755-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha C Pocovi, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Simon D French, Petra L Graham, Johanna M van Dongen, Jane Latimer, Dafna Merom, Anne Tiedemann, Christopher G Maher, Ornella Clavisi, Shuk Yin Kate Tong, Mark J Hancock

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 726 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 16 21%
Other 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 29%
Unspecified 15 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 17%
Computer Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3857. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,381
of 26,811,236 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#94
of 43,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 324,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#2
of 349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,811,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.