The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Cortical gyrification pattern of depression in Parkinson's disease: a neuroimaging marker for disease severity?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1428166 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qin Shen, Haiyan Liao, Sainan Cai, Qinru Liu, Min Wang, Chendie Song, Fan Zhou, Yujing Liu, Jiaying Yuan, Yuqing Tang, Xu Li, Jun Liu, Changlian Tan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,039,839
of 26,170,895 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,426
of 5,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,166
of 230,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#10
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.