↓ Skip to main content

The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care , June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care , June 2024
DOI 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ankit Gupta, Ruth Burgess, Michael Drozd, John Gierula, Klaus Witte, Sam Straw

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,390,704
of 26,294,065 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#301
of 1,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,268
of 191,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,294,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.