↓ Skip to main content

Surge of neurophysiological coherence and connectivity in the dying brain

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
Title
Surge of neurophysiological coherence and connectivity in the dying brain
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1308285110
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Borjigin, U. Lee, T. Liu, D. Pal, S. Huff, D. Klarr, J. Sloboda, J. Hernandez, M. M. Wang, G. A. Mashour

Abstract

The brain is assumed to be hypoactive during cardiac arrest. However, the neurophysiological state of the brain immediately following cardiac arrest has not been systematically investigated. In this study, we performed continuous electroencephalography in rats undergoing experimental cardiac arrest and analyzed changes in power density, coherence, directed connectivity, and cross-frequency coupling. We identified a transient surge of synchronous gamma oscillations that occurred within the first 30 s after cardiac arrest and preceded isoelectric electroencephalogram. Gamma oscillations during cardiac arrest were global and highly coherent; moreover, this frequency band exhibited a striking increase in anterior-posterior-directed connectivity and tight phase-coupling to both theta and alpha waves. High-frequency neurophysiological activity in the near-death state exceeded levels found during the conscious waking state. These data demonstrate that the mammalian brain can, albeit paradoxically, generate neural correlates of heightened conscious processing at near-death.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 244 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 4%
Germany 5 1%
Japan 5 1%
France 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Cuba 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 320 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 25%
Researcher 71 19%
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Professor 25 7%
Other 100 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 23%
Psychology 69 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 16%
Neuroscience 48 13%
Unspecified 33 9%
Other 78 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 812. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,792
of 13,118,945 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#227
of 79,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51
of 154,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4
of 883 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,118,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 883 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.