↓ Skip to main content

Psychedelics and Mental Health: A Population Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 125,160)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
70 news outlets
blogs
18 blogs
twitter
538 tweeters
facebook
183 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
13 Google+ users
reddit
15 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychedelics and Mental Health: A Population Study
Published in
PLoS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063972
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teri S. Krebs, Pål-Ørjan Johansen, Krebs TS, Johansen PØ

Abstract

The classical serotonergic psychedelics LSD, psilocybin, mescaline are not known to cause brain damage and are regarded as non-addictive. Clinical studies do not suggest that psychedelics cause long-term mental health problems. Psychedelics have been used in the Americas for thousands of years. Over 30 million people currently living in the US have used LSD, psilocybin, or mescaline.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 538 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Brazil 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 231 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 69 27%
Student > Master 45 17%
Researcher 42 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 52 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 14%
Neuroscience 16 6%
Unspecified 14 5%
Other 67 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,601
of 9,728,122 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#35
of 125,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23
of 137,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#3
of 3,793 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,728,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,793 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.