↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating a multispecies adaptive management framework: must uncertainty impede effective decision-making?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating a multispecies adaptive management framework: must uncertainty impede effective decision-making?
Published in
Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2013
DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12145
Authors

David R. Smith, Conor P. McGowan, Jonathan P. Daily, James D. Nichols, John A. Sweka, James E. Lyons

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Australia 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 97 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 24%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 38%
Environmental Science 30 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 15 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,865,725
of 15,175,259 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,710
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,772
of 162,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,175,259 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.