↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating a multispecies adaptive management framework: must uncertainty impede effective decision-making?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating a multispecies adaptive management framework: must uncertainty impede effective decision-making?
Published in
Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2013
DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12145
Authors

David R. Smith, Conor P. McGowan, Jonathan P. Daily, James D. Nichols, John A. Sweka, James E. Lyons

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Australia 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 77 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Other 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 45%
Environmental Science 23 28%
Unspecified 13 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,126,080
of 13,457,898 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,462
of 2,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,981
of 158,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,457,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.