↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating a multispecies adaptive management framework: must uncertainty impede effective decision‐making?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating a multispecies adaptive management framework: must uncertainty impede effective decision‐making?
Published in
Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2013
DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12145
Authors

David R. Smith, Conor P. McGowan, Jonathan P. Daily, James D. Nichols, John A. Sweka, James E. Lyons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Australia 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 119 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 33%
Environmental Science 32 26%
Computer Science 13 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,909,897
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,545
of 3,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,546
of 205,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#32
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.