↓ Skip to main content

Carbon stocks of trees killed by bark beetles and wildfire in the western United States

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon stocks of trees killed by bark beetles and wildfire in the western United States
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), August 2013
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035032
Authors

Jeffrey A Hicke, Arjan J H Meddens, Craig D Allen, Crystal A Kolden

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Unknown 138 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 28%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 42 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 30 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2013.
All research outputs
#1,218,611
of 19,838,842 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1,573
of 4,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,824
of 175,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#26
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,838,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.