↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analytical study of the selected wine varieties grown in Montenegro

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Product Research, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analytical study of the selected wine varieties grown in Montenegro
Published in
Natural Product Research, February 2017
DOI 10.1080/14786419.2017.1289209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neda O. Đorđević, Miroslav M. Novaković, Boris Pejin, Jelena J. Mutić, Vlatka E. Vajs, Snežana B. Pajović, Vele V. Tešević

Abstract

Samples of the selected red wine varieties grown in Montenegro (Merlot, Cabernet Sauvignon and Vranac; vintages 2010-2012) were compared according to total phenolic content, anti-DPPH radical activity, phenolic profile and elemental composition. All the samples showed profound anti-DPPH radical activity, due to high content of total phenolic compounds (R = 0.92). The most abundant phenolics were catechin and gallic acid with the highest values recorded for Merlot 2012 (43.22 and 28.65 mg/L, respectively). In addition to this, the content of essential elements including the potentially toxic ones was within healthy (safe) level for all the samples analysed. This study has actually pointed out Merlot wine variety as the best quality one, though all three varieties may be used as safe and health-promoting nutritional products.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 38%
Unspecified 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,585,339
of 16,036,801 outputs
Outputs from Natural Product Research
#290
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,727
of 262,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Product Research
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,036,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.