The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for the management of dry mouth: non‐pharmacological interventions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009603.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Susan Furness, Gemma Bryan, Roddy McMillan, Sarah Birchenough, Helen V Worthington |
Abstract |
Xerostomia is the subjective sensation of dry mouth. Common causes of xerostomia include adverse effects of many commonly prescribed medications, disease (e.g. Sjogren's Syndrome) and radiotherapy treatment for head and neck cancers. Non-pharmacological techniques such as acupuncture or mild electrostimulation may be used to improve symptoms. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 20% |
United States | 3 | 12% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Kuwait | 1 | 4% |
Solomon Islands | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 428 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 72 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 60 | 14% |
Researcher | 36 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 7% |
Other | 77 | 18% |
Unknown | 123 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 171 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 7% |
Psychology | 14 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
Other | 52 | 12% |
Unknown | 142 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,023,839
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,318
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,179
of 209,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.