↓ Skip to main content

The impact of voluntary food fortification on micronutrient intakes and status in European countries: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of voluntary food fortification on micronutrient intakes and status in European countries: a review
Published in
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, September 2013
DOI 10.1017/s002966511300339x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Áine Hennessy, Janette Walton, Albert Flynn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 22%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 10 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
#689
of 1,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,199
of 214,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.