↓ Skip to main content

In Situ Observations of Interstellar Plasma with Voyager 1

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
79 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
213 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In Situ Observations of Interstellar Plasma with Voyager 1
Published in
Science, September 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1241681
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. A. Gurnett, W. S. Kurth, L. F. Burlaga, N. F. Ness

Abstract

Launched over 35 years ago, Voyagers 1 and 2 are on an epic journey outward from the Sun to reach the boundary between the solar plasma and the much cooler interstellar medium. The boundary, called the heliopause, is expected to be marked by a large increase in plasma density, from about 0.002 per cubic centimeter (cm(-3)) in the outer heliosphere, to about 0.1 cm(-3) in the interstellar medium. On 9 April 2013, the Voyager 1 plasma wave instrument began detecting locally generated electron plasma oscillations at a frequency of about 2.6 kilohertz. This oscillation frequency corresponds to an electron density of about 0.08 cm(-3), very close to the value expected in the interstellar medium. These and other observations provide strong evidence that Voyager 1 has crossed the heliopause into the nearby interstellar plasma.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Estonia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 67 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 38%
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 44 59%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Engineering 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 5 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 822. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,373
of 17,429,432 outputs
Outputs from Science
#706
of 70,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61
of 170,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#9
of 892 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,429,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 892 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.