↓ Skip to main content

Courage and Compassion: Virtues in Caring for So-Called “Difficult” Patients

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
55 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Courage and Compassion: Virtues in Caring for So-Called “Difficult” Patients
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.4.medu2-1704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Hawking, Farr A Curlin, John D Yoon

Abstract

What, if anything, can medical ethics offer to assist in the care of the "difficult" patient? We begin with a discussion of virtue theory and its application to medical ethics. We conceptualize the "difficult" patient as an example of a "moral stress test" that especially challenges the physician's character, requiring the good physician to display the virtues of courage and compassion. We then consider two clinical vignettes to flesh out how these virtues might come into play in the care of "difficult" patients, and we conclude with a brief proposal for how medical educators might cultivate these essential character traits in physicians-in-training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Psychology 4 9%
Philosophy 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 36%