↓ Skip to main content

Modified Carba NP test for the detection of carbapenemase production in gram-negative rods: optimized handling of multiple samples

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modified Carba NP test for the detection of carbapenemase production in gram-negative rods: optimized handling of multiple samples
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.09.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eloiza H. Campana, Stephanie G. Chuster, Isadora R. da Silva, Raphael P. Paschoal, Raquel R. Bonelli, Beatriz M. Moreira, Renata C. Picão

Abstract

The modified Carba NP test presented here may be a valuable tool for laboratories interested in investigating a large number of carbapenemase-producing bacteria in a less-costly way. The test was evaluated against 48 carbapenemase-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing gram-negative bacteria. No false-positive results were obtained, but false-negative results were observed with OXA-23- and GES-carbapenemase-producing isolates. Aeromonas sp. are not testable by Modified Carba NP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 25%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 11 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#824
of 1,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,592
of 420,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,377 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.