@WeDontHaveTime @ProfSteveKeen @GraemeMaxton @ClubOfRome The article is actually misleading when quoting #MichaelEMann - he was taking about triggering disastrous feedbacks, but we need to keep CO2 below 350 not 450 ppm to stay within reasonably safe bound
RT @ClimateBen: 'If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.'…
RT @ClimateBen: 'If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.'…
RT @ClimateBen: 'If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.'…
RT @ClimateBen: 'If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.'…
RT @ClimateBen: 'If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.'…
'If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.' https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh
I am not an engineer, nor an economist, so I may be getting this wrong. Please correct me if I do. On eve of Biden #ClimateSummit, I read in @PLOS paper, "At present there are no proven technologies capable of large-scale air capture of CO2. https://t.co/
RT @ClimateBen: 'Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020.. causes CO2 to remain above 350 ppm (with associated impacts on climate) un…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020.. causes CO2 to remain above 350 ppm (with associated impacts on climate) un…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020.. causes CO2 to remain above 350 ppm (with associated impacts on climate) un…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020.. causes CO2 to remain above 350 ppm (with associated impacts on climate) un…
RT @ClimateBen: 'Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020.. causes CO2 to remain above 350 ppm (with associated impacts on climate) un…
'Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020.. causes CO2 to remain above 350 ppm (with associated impacts on climate) until 2300. If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.'
RT @Bankfieldbecky: going back a bit, here’s an early paper (2013) from Jim Hansen and colleagues that most fuels need to stay in the groun…
@350Indonesia @DrJamesHansen et al. segabreg https://t.co/PmtamI0fVY
@hommedeboutx @ericvidalenc @GaelGiraud_CNRS @CEA @momotchiii @OSTERElizabeth1 L'eau se condense: source cours de physique de 6ème. Inertie du système climatique: https://t.co/plHgRfoRcG (premier screenshot) Et j'ajouterais https://t.co/WZJoh0GlFq (second
@hausfath @cohan_ds Does this mean that the "slow feedbacks" mentioned in this paper https://t.co/vkBZ73GHNA would not kick in? Did these authors get something wrong? Or did I misunderstand something?
@MichaelEMann @SteveHanleyRI @cleantechnica Does this mean that the "slow feedbacks" mentioned in this paper https://t.co/vkBZ73GHNA cannot be expected to trigger substantial further warming once emissions are down to zero?
@mallenbaker @mathewsheffield @ExtinctionR @XRebellionUK @Sir_David_King @BBCRadio4 Here's an article that is better in its use of language https://t.co/n1f85KV6sC
@TaroIstok @GeminiiAussie @gougle_lads @DanCady @dennywhite11 @ianbrow97534170 @canncr @KeillerDon The second study has nothing to do with population size, and assesses the carbon cycle of Earth to address what emissions changes need occur. It has no polit
Assessing “Dangerous Climate Change”: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature “Mega-heatwaves.... have become more widespread with the increase demonstrably linked to global warming” https://t.co/c5YyEv
@AlanMyattPhD @TheWaffel3 @pamela89133761 @MedianPolitics @Calqlus @PatTheBerner @KamalaHarris @JoeBiden Not enough but it's a no brainer. We're subsidizing an industry poisoning people's tap water with solvents. We're at 400ppm CO2. The theory is leavin
@riskparty63 @joostbrinkman @Shell Stom. Was vergeten dat de olie industrie vol zit met goeddoeners die Afrika willen helpen en dat ze niet voor bakken met geld werken Lees anders een academisch artikel over de dodelijke impact van de olie industrie, deze
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
RT @ClimateBen: The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on…
The 2013 quote comes from this Hansen paper: https://t.co/7k87Ks0Tgh 'Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on carbon emissions...' was the message but we're beyond that. We need stronger, direct action to rapidly stop emissions from virtually
RT @SteB777: 4) The impacts of the climate crisis alone would have massive impacts on biodiversity and could destroy over half of all life…
4) The impacts of the climate crisis alone would have massive impacts on biodiversity and could destroy over half of all life on Earth if there are not big reductions in carbon emissions. https://t.co/JwTdNGpigs
@NickAPalmer @barnabyWjackson @XRHealthPros @DoctorVive @IPBES Have a read of this. It is authored by some of the leading climate scientists in the world. https://t.co/JwTdNG7HoU
RT @Bankfieldbecky: going back a bit, here’s an early paper (2013) from Jim Hansen and colleagues that most fuels need to stay in the groun…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: going back a bit, here’s an early paper (2013) from Jim Hansen and colleagues that most fuels need to stay in the groun…
going back a bit, here’s an early paper (2013) from Jim Hansen and colleagues that most fuels need to stay in the ground https://t.co/7k7UltGChM & similar from 2014 by Matthews https://t.co/ZoaC7EjSN5 7/16
was conducted in 2013. https://t.co/UmjB4AcyK5
RT @viva_verde: 9) In fact, ~60% of the public would receive more in dividend than they paid in tax https://t.co/Vfu73IrQXE
RT @viva_verde: 9) In fact, ~60% of the public would receive more in dividend than they paid in tax https://t.co/Vfu73IrQXE
RT @viva_verde: 9) In fact, ~60% of the public would receive more in dividend than they paid in tax https://t.co/Vfu73IrQXE
RT @viva_verde: 9) In fact, ~60% of the public would receive more in dividend than they paid in tax https://t.co/Vfu73IrQXE
9) In fact, ~60% of the public would receive more in dividend than they paid in tax https://t.co/Vfu73IrQXE
Assessing “Dangerous Climate Change”: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature https://t.co/MPrD4C9RWn
@latimeralder @Stevens19871810 Thank you. Article below shows why 350 is a good target. But the real dispute is whether there needs to be *any* limit to CO2. Isn't your argument that there's no emergency and no CO2 problem? https://t.co/qeGDe1jyBd
@Peters_Glen @Cyclestrian @JKSteinberger Consider e.g. (or also) slow feedbacks as evident in paleoclimate models. Etc. Are Hansen et al definitely wrong?: https://t.co/1ZuKZT4r5h
@neilrkaye Assessing “Dangerous Climate Change”: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature https://t.co/Jv2iIhmKnC
https://t.co/Un4Z3oJdIi Transition to a post-fossil fuel world of clean energies will not occur as long as fossil fuels appear to be the cheapest energy. Fossil fuels are cheap only because they do not pay their costs to society and receive large direct a
RT @THOMPSONP1950: NASA recently said that a solar minimum is on the way..meaning a cooling planet... https://t.co/pJElYq4Ouo
@THOMPSONP1950 Absolutely not. You won't even read the report. This is a report from one of the most credible scientists in the entire world. Read it. https://t.co/R4piktcv7N
@THOMPSONP1950 You need to actually read the science. Read this scientific report by Dr. James Hansen, former director of the NASA Goddard Space Institute: https://t.co/R4piktcv7N
@lynn_weiser @SteveBrownBC Read this: https://t.co/R4piktu6wn
Why don't you Google Dr. John Christy's testimony to the Congress Committee on Science and Technology in 2017? A real scientist. Original UN IPCC lead author. Hansen's a joke and broadly discredited. #climatechange
Quoting Hansen is thin grool. Anything else?
@JamesMc86141084 @SteveBrownBC Here, read this scientific journal by Dr. James Hansen, former director of the NASA Goddard Space Institute: https://t.co/R4piktu6wn
@SteveBrownBC The troposphere isn't affected by CO2. CO2 remains in the stratosphere. Read the science. https://t.co/R4piktu6wn
@SteveBrownBC Look it up. Read the science. That's not what I research, but if you need more info, read this scientific journal by Dr. James Hansen. https://t.co/R4piktu6wn
@Carbongate @Laurie_Garrett Here's the data for solar irradiance without the forecast. Source: https://t.co/q5dqWgQLox https://t.co/gMAEWVqPWt
“Greenland and Antarctica have been losing mass at rapidly increasing rates during the period of accurate satellite data [23]; the data are suggestive of exponential increase, but the records are too short to be conclusive.” => Sea level rise 1m or more
@SpudSlingsby @dpcarrington @sciencemagazine @isabella_tree @kneppcastle The scientific evidence is that climate change the most serious and immediate threat we face. Please read this peer reviewed scientific paper by some of the leading climate scientists
RT @PatrickAMazza: @billmckibben I still refer to the scenario Jim Hansen et al set out in his 2013 article to support the youth climate la…
@billmckibben I still refer to the scenario Jim Hansen et al set out in his 2013 article to support the youth climate lawsuits, aiming at stabilization near current temps by radical annual carbon cuts and re-greening. Now it would take a global revolution.
RT @SteB777: @BirdgirlUK @IPBES Whilst it is right it would not collapse mother nature, it could cause the extinction of a very large propo…
@BirdgirlUK @IPBES Whilst it is right it would not collapse mother nature, it could cause the extinction of a very large proportion of our current biodiversity. https://t.co/JwTdNG7HoU
@madgie1941 @mrjonnotweet @kate_edmonds_EU @BBCr4today @ret_ward @Ed_Miliband @GretaThunberg @noamchomskyT @ClubOfRome @TheVenusProject @BuckyFuller_ Let put put it simply to you Margaret. Do you not accept the science on climate change being an existentia
RT @SteB777: @Zane1968 @GeraldKutney @gjcats @ClimateHysteria @cathmckenna I think you need to educate yourself about climate change and it…
@Zane1968 @GeraldKutney @gjcats @ClimateHysteria @cathmckenna I think you need to educate yourself about climate change and it's likely impacts. You seem to have no grasp of the increasing impacts of climate change. https://t.co/JwTdNG7HoU
@CColose e.g. re: symmetric decay from either a positive or negative pulse... Panel A, from https://t.co/fwE2yuHAFj https://t.co/KOxrFEBQ09
RT @Eco_melon: “We have a PLANETARY CLIMATE CRISIS that requires urgent change to our energy and carbon pathway to avoid dangerous conseque…
RT @Eco_melon: “We have a PLANETARY CLIMATE CRISIS that requires urgent change to our energy and carbon pathway to avoid dangerous conseque…
RT @Eco_melon: “We have a PLANETARY CLIMATE CRISIS that requires urgent change to our energy and carbon pathway to avoid dangerous conseque…
RT @Eco_melon: “We have a PLANETARY CLIMATE CRISIS that requires urgent change to our energy and carbon pathway to avoid dangerous conseque…
RT @Eco_melon: “We have a PLANETARY CLIMATE CRISIS that requires urgent change to our energy and carbon pathway to avoid dangerous conseque…
“We have a PLANETARY CLIMATE CRISIS that requires urgent change to our energy and carbon pathway to avoid dangerous consequences for young people and other life on Earth.” Hansen et al. https://t.co/Jv2iIhmKnC 22/n
RT @autofac: [To state the very very obvious: there is absolutely no possibility of "energy security" in a society plunged into degeneratin…
[To state the very very obvious: there is absolutely no possibility of "energy security" in a society plunged into degenerating climate chaos. And there is no serious room for fossil fuels in a world where we manage to avoid that. https://t.co/0vU0yo8vg9]
RT @Doug350: THINK CRITICALLY! #WeDontHaveTime given https://t.co/duWnxKnKC7 & https://t.co/aLwXh9YkhQ 6%-9%/yr CO2 decline + drawdown (CDR…
THINK CRITICALLY! #WeDontHaveTime given https://t.co/duWnxKnKC7 & https://t.co/aLwXh9YkhQ 6%-9%/yr CO2 decline + drawdown (CDR DAC OIF) for 2°C. CONUNDRUM: Oil&Gas inability to provide a just transition due to Price/Earning ratio debt dismantling d
If Earth’s energy imbalance is 0.75 W/m2, CO2 must be reduced to about 345 ppm to restore energy balance [64], [75]. https://t.co/DD2FUlBBpC