@Climate_of_apes @caddickoliver1 @TwoSidesBalance @MichaelEMann @Anikendra_10 Amen @Climate_of_apes we have wasted 11 precious years since @DrJamesEHansen et al explained <350 physics in straight forward English in https://t.co/duWnxKnKC7 and 750 refin
• 2007 @DrJamesEHansen told @BillMcKibben <350ppm • 2013 https://t.co/duWnxKnKC7: 6%/yr emission reduction plus #biochar & #reforestation CO2 sequestration • We failed to #RetireRefineries #OnePerWeek • #CoolTheArctic & oceans by all means to av
@Anikendra_10 @MichaelEMann • 2007 @DrJamesEHansen told @BillMcKibben <350ppm • 2013 https://t.co/duWnxKnKC7: 6%/yr emission reduction plus #biochar & #reforestation CO2 sequestration • We failed to #RetireRefineries #OnePerWeek • #CoolTheArctic &am
@SchneidGabriel @EgelerChristian @MarcBuergi Gerne eine kleine Auswahl für dich, Herr Schneider: https://t.co/S7b4jqjIqe https://t.co/2z0MGDZSTp https://t.co/WODNBVdP0K https://t.co/eVjV3xABqR https://t.co/9jkFtxZYtk https://t.co/OAVDZHES6F https://
RT @JimbEstvAJ: @ChGefaell Toma, puedes empezar a leer por aquí: https://t.co/qVKRBBTpSr https://t.co/nMhrngbkXr https://t.co/eouNkEfNZt ht…
RT @TOGETHERONWARD1: @wideawake_media Anyone who believes climate science can be explained with an image is a dummy. Here's an article whi…
@wideawake_media Anyone who believes climate science can be explained with an image is a dummy. Here's an article which puts your nonsense into perspective. #ClimateScam is a scam #ClimateEmergency requires an immediate response https://t.co/W7sIIn7Ooe
@ChGefaell Toma, puedes empezar a leer por aquí: https://t.co/qVKRBBTpSr https://t.co/nMhrngbkXr https://t.co/eouNkEfNZt https://t.co/PRn9CtbqOn
RT @Karmageddon67: “Cumulative emissions of ∼1000 GtC, sometimes associated with 2°C global warming, would spur “slow” feedbacks and eventu…
“Cumulative emissions of ∼1000 GtC, sometimes associated with 2°C global warming, would spur “slow” feedbacks and eventual warming of 3–4°C with disastrous consequences.” So adding 195Gt will add another 0.4°C &eventually add 0.7°C, by ‘low C’ transiti
@DrDanONeill @AljosaSlamersak @g_kallis @NatureComms @SRILeeds @PriestleyCentre @ICTA_UAB @R_Degrowth @ISEEORG @ESEEORG @SEELeeds “Cumulative emissions of ∼1000 GtC, sometimes associated with 2°C global warming, would spur “slow” feedbacks and eventual war
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
@w_knorr I agree with Hansen that even 2ºC is not safe & that we will blow through 2ºC before 2050 with ERA. Do you believe that 2ºC warming is "acceptable"? https://t.co/qxsb9JoJze
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
And thus the case for SRM.
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
https://t.co/VklsQSmstI Strictly science. #climatechange
RT @jembendell: "emissions of ∼1000 GtC, sometimes associated with 2°C global warming, would spur “slow” feedbacks & eventual warming of 3–…
RT @jembendell: "emissions of ∼1000 GtC, sometimes associated with 2°C global warming, would spur “slow” feedbacks & eventual warming of 3–…
"emissions of ∼1000 GtC, sometimes associated with 2°C global warming, would spur “slow” feedbacks & eventual warming of 3–4°C with disastrous consequences" Translation: climate policy has been suicidal bullshit that serves elites. #ClimateBreakdown
@JamesGDyke This was nearly ten years ago https://t.co/OvyUWBAjmn
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
Hansen quote regarding #fosslfuels & #ClimateChange #ClimateJustice
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
RT @ScientistsX: @ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be…
@ucl Hansen et al 2013: "Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be an act of extraordinary witting intergenerational injustice." 10/n https://t.co/jD3gVd65Dw https://t.co/E9tri6XzE4
@Kadji100 Nicht, dass man sich auf die IPCC-Veröffentlichungen stützen müsste, nur weil sie von über 150 Wissenschaftlern begutachtet wurden, die Auswirkungen des Menschen auf das globale Klima kann man auch anhand einzelner Studien gut nachweisen (z.B. ht
RT @ClimateBen: 'If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.'…
RT @ClimateBen: 'If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.'…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
Does this take into account the rise in other #GlobalWarming gases given off by our melting permafrost or the fact as CO2 levels rise the #EarthsOceans absorb less #Carbon ? Very curious ... 😎
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
RT @ClimateBen: 3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 pp…
3.Delaying fossil fuel emission cuts until 2020 (..2%/year emissions growth in 2012–2020) causes CO2 to remain above 350 ppm until 2300. If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500
RT @ClimateBen: 'If reductions are delayed until 2030 or 2050, CO2 remains above 350 ppm or 400 ppm, respectively, until well after 2500.'…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @MonitoDeTrapo: Hay una posibilidad muy alta de que en los próximos cinco años experimentemos por un tiempo acotado qué significa sobrep…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @MonitoDeTrapo: Hay una posibilidad muy alta de que en los próximos cinco años experimentemos por un tiempo acotado qué significa sobrep…
RT @MonitoDeTrapo: Hay una posibilidad muy alta de que en los próximos cinco años experimentemos por un tiempo acotado qué significa sobrep…
RT @MonitoDeTrapo: Hay una posibilidad muy alta de que en los próximos cinco años experimentemos por un tiempo acotado qué significa sobrep…
RT @MonitoDeTrapo: Hay una posibilidad muy alta de que en los próximos cinco años experimentemos por un tiempo acotado qué significa sobrep…
Hay una posibilidad muy alta de que en los próximos cinco años experimentemos por un tiempo acotado qué significa sobrepasar los 1.5°C de anomalía global. Tendremos una muestra de lo que nos espera y, aún así, seguiremos aumentando la concentración de CO2.
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
RT @w_knorr: Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly t…
Back in 2013 Jim Hansen et al published this paper showing the net zero by 2050 will never deliver 350 ppm, which is roughly the same as 1.5, because of the slowness of CO2 uptake by the carbon cycle. Just as a reminder: https://t.co/rWBQgGIEMR https://t.c