You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Lysophagy: A Method for Monitoring Lysosomal Rupture Followed by Autophagy-Dependent Recovery
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 8 |
Book title |
Lysosomes
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6934-0_8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6932-6, 978-1-4939-6934-0
|
Authors |
Otomo, Takanobu, Yoshimori, Tamotsu, Takanobu Otomo, Tamotsu Yoshimori |
Editors |
Karin Öllinger, Hanna Appelqvist |
Abstract |
Selective autophagy recognizes specific targets, including damaged mitochondria (mitophagy), aggregated proteins (aggrephagy), and invading bacteria (xenophagy) to engulf by isolation membrane, and degrades toxic materials within lysosomes. We recently revealed that a membrane-damaged lysosome itself also becomes a target of autophagy and named this process lysophagy. In this chapter, we describe methods for monitoring lysophagy; detecting lysosomal damage by staining of galectin and study the subsequent autophagic process in cultured mammalian cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,418,183
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,923
of 13,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,071
of 310,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#231
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.