You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Using the MEROPS Database for Investigation of Lysosomal Peptidases, Their Inhibitors, and Substrates
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Lysosomes
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6934-0_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6932-6, 978-1-4939-6934-0
|
| Authors |
Rawlings, Neil D., Neil D. Rawlings |
| Editors |
Karin Öllinger, Hanna Appelqvist |
| Abstract |
This chapter describes how to retrieve data on lysosomal peptidases from the MEROPS database for proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors ( http://merops.sanger.ac.uk ). Features described in this chapter include the summary page, pages for structure, interactions with inhibitors, substrates, literature and involvement in physiological pathways, and how to download data from the MEROPS FTP site. The lysosomal peptidase legumain is used as an example. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,457,417
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,377
of 13,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,430
of 310,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#116
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.