You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chlorpromazine versus placebo for schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000284.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clive E Adams, George A Awad, John Rathbone, Ben Thornley, Karla Soares-Weiser |
| Abstract |
Chlorpromazine, formulated in the 1950s, remains a benchmark treatment for people with schizophrenia. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 84% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 367 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 18% |
| Researcher | 50 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 11% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 17% |
| Unknown | 82 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 28% |
| Psychology | 63 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 13% |
| Unknown | 87 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,216,480
of 23,784,266 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,753
of 12,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,073
of 309,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,784,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.