The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Synthesis Centers as Critical Research Infrastructure
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioScience, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1093/biosci/bix053 |
Authors |
Jill S. Baron, Alison Specht, Eric Garnier, Pamela Bishop, C. Andrew Campbell, Frank W. Davis, Bruno Fady, Dawn Field, Louis J. Gross, Siddeswara M. Guru, Benjamin S. Halpern, Stephanie E. Hampton, Peter R. Leavitt, Thomas R. Meagher, Jean Ometto, John N. Parker, Richard Price, Casey H. Rawson, Allen Rodrigo, Laura A. Sheble, Marten Winter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 38 | 45% |
Australia | 4 | 5% |
Germany | 4 | 5% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 46 | 55% |
Scientists | 35 | 42% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 22% |
Professor | 10 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 21 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Computer Science | 7 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 31 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#736,978
of 26,794,666 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#285
of 2,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,454
of 337,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.