You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Trends and concepts in fern classification
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Botany, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1093/aob/mct299 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maarten J. M. Christenhusz, Mark W. Chase |
Abstract |
Throughout the history of fern classification, familial and generic concepts have been highly labile. Many classifications and evolutionary schemes have been proposed during the last two centuries, reflecting different interpretations of the available evidence. Knowledge of fern structure and life histories has increased through time, providing more evidence on which to base ideas of possible relationships, and classification has changed accordingly. This paper reviews previous classifications of ferns and presents ideas on how to achieve a more stable consensus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 299 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 42 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 42 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 13% |
Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
Professor | 18 | 6% |
Other | 54 | 17% |
Unknown | 77 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 139 | 45% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 19 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Unspecified | 8 | 3% |
Other | 22 | 7% |
Unknown | 87 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,946,895
of 26,397,269 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#354
of 3,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,017
of 333,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,397,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.