You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Creating a Handwriting Recognition Corpus for Bushman Languages
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 28 |
Book title |
Digital Libraries: For Cultural Heritage, Knowledge Dissemination, and Future Creation
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-24826-9_28 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-224825-2, 978-3-64-224826-9
|
Authors |
Kyle Williams, Hussein Suleman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Other | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2013.
All research outputs
#5,654,025
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,846
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,328
of 180,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#51
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.