↓ Skip to main content

Framing Confusion: Dementia, Society, and History

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Framing Confusion: Dementia, Society, and History
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, July 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.7.mhst1-1707
Pubmed ID
Abstract

This essay will briefly sketch historical changes in the framing of dementia since the late nineteenth century. In broad terms, this period has seen a shift from viewing dementia as a pathological variant of normal aging to viewing it as a distinct disease. Although this broad reframing of dementia was clearly positive in raising awareness and funding for research, it had some negative aspects that should be considered. Caregiving came to seem less important than research aimed at a cure, and the stigma surrounding dementia has, if anything, increased.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 36%
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 7 28%