You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systemic 5-fluorouracil treatment causes a syndrome of delayed myelin destruction in the central nervous system
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Biology, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/jbiol69 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ruolan Han, Yin M Yang, Joerg Dietrich, Anne Luebke, Margot Mayer-Pröschel, Mark Noble |
Abstract |
Cancer treatment with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents often is associated with delayed adverse neurological consequences. Despite their clinical importance, almost nothing is known about the basis for such effects. It is not even known whether the occurrence of delayed adverse effects requires exposure to multiple chemotherapeutic agents, the presence of both chemotherapeutic agents and the body's own response to cancer, prolonged damage to the blood-brain barrier, inflammation or other such changes. Nor are there any animal models that could enable the study of this important problem. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 191 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
Researcher | 21 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 36 | 18% |
Unknown | 35 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 24 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 8% |
Psychology | 13 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 17% |
Unknown | 37 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,241,087
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,669
of 170,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them