The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
National water summary on wetland resources
|
---|---|
Published in |
US Geological Survey, January 1996
|
DOI | 10.3133/wsp2425 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 28% |
Researcher | 13 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 27 | 39% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 22% |
Engineering | 8 | 12% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,782,650
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#285
of 2,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,667
of 79,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.