↓ Skip to main content

Types of intraocular lenses for cataract surgery in eyes with uveitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Types of intraocular lenses for cataract surgery in eyes with uveitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007284.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theresa G Leung, Kristina Lindsley, Irene C Kuo

Abstract

Cataract formation often occurs in people with uveitis. It is unclear which intraocular lens (IOL) type is optimal for use in cataract surgery for eyes with uveitis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 20%
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 14 15%
Unspecified 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 43%
Unspecified 16 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Engineering 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 21 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,053,290
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,375
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,839
of 190,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.