↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
247 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
580 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003607.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Esposito, Maria Gabriella Grusovin, Pietro Felice, Georgios Karatzopoulos, Helen V Worthington, Paul Coulthard

Abstract

Dental implants require sufficient bone to be adequately stabilised. For some patients implant treatment would not be an option without horizontal or vertical bone augmentation. A variety of materials and surgical techniques are available for bone augmentation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 571 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 125 22%
Student > Postgraduate 67 12%
Researcher 52 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 9%
Student > Bachelor 43 7%
Other 90 16%
Unknown 151 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 321 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 3%
Psychology 12 2%
Materials Science 8 1%
Other 33 6%
Unknown 170 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2014.
All research outputs
#16,640,335
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,358
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,631
of 106,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.