↓ Skip to main content

Metabolomics study of Populus type propolis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolomics study of Populus type propolis
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.12.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boban Anđelković, Ljubodrag Vujisić, Ivan Vučković, Vele Tešević, Vlatka Vajs, Dejan Gođevac

Abstract

Herein, we propose rapid and simple spectroscopic methods to determine the chemical composition of propolis derived from various Populus species using a metabolomics approach. In order to correlate variability in Populus type propolis composition with the altitude of its collection, NMR, IR, and UV spectroscopy followed by OPLS was conducted. The botanical origin of propolis was established by comparing propolis spectral data to those of buds of various Populus species. An O2PLS method was utilized to integrate two blocks of data. According to OPLS and O2PLS, the major compounds in propolis samples, collected from temperate continental climate above 500m, were phenolic glycerides originating from P. tremula buds. Flavonoids were predominant in propolis samples collected below 400m, originating from P. nigra and P. x euramericana buds. Samples collected at 400-500m were of mixed origin, with variable amounts of all detected metabolites.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Chemistry 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,566,650
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis
#2,578
of 4,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,903
of 420,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis
#23
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.