↓ Skip to main content

Back Schools for chronic non‐specific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
34 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
609 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Back Schools for chronic non‐specific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011674.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrícia Parreira, Martijn W Heymans, Maurits W van Tulder, Rosmin Esmail, Bart W Koes, Nolwenn Poquet, Chung‐Wei Christine Lin, Christopher G Maher

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 609 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 607 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 15%
Student > Master 81 13%
Researcher 41 7%
Other 38 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 6%
Other 117 19%
Unknown 206 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 155 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 113 19%
Sports and Recreations 18 3%
Psychology 15 2%
Social Sciences 14 2%
Other 62 10%
Unknown 232 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,198,560
of 26,625,282 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,282
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,784
of 333,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,625,282 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.