↓ Skip to main content

Back Schools for chronic non‐specific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
596 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Back Schools for chronic non‐specific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011674.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrícia Parreira, Martijn W Heymans, Maurits W van Tulder, Rosmin Esmail, Bart W Koes, Nolwenn Poquet, Chung‐Wei Christine Lin, Christopher G Maher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 594 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 15%
Student > Master 79 13%
Researcher 41 7%
Other 38 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 6%
Other 117 20%
Unknown 195 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 112 19%
Sports and Recreations 18 3%
Psychology 15 3%
Social Sciences 14 2%
Other 61 10%
Unknown 223 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,113,613
of 26,161,782 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,121
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,721
of 332,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,161,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.