↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography With Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
297 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography With Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy
Published in
Circulation, August 2009
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.109.859280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Dewey, Elke Zimmermann, Florian Deissenrieder, Michael Laule, Hans-Peter Dübel, Peter Schlattmann, Fabian Knebel, Wolfgang Rutsch, Bernd Hamm

Abstract

Noninvasive coronary angiography with the use of multislice computed tomography (CT) scanners is feasible with high sensitivity and negative predictive value; however, the radiation exposure associated with this technique is rather high. We evaluated coronary angiography using whole-heart 320-row CT, which avoids exposure-intensive overscanning and overranging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 96 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Other 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 60%
Engineering 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,231,676
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#4,783
of 21,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,176
of 105,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#17
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.