↓ Skip to main content

Peptide Synthesis and Applications

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Peptide Synthesis and Applications'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis: An Introduction
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Linkers, Resins, and General Procedures for Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Peptide Release, Side-Chain Deprotection, Work-Up, and Isolation
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Synthesis of Peptides Using Tert -Butyloxycarbonyl (Boc) as the α-Amino Protection Group
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Sequential Formation of Regioselective Disulfide Bonds in Synthetic Peptides with Multiple Disulfide Bonds
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Synthesis of Cyclic Disulfide-Rich Peptides
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Preparation of C-terminally Modified Chemokines by Expressed Protein Ligation.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Synthesis of C-Terminal Peptide Thioesters Using Fmoc-Based Solid-Phase Peptide Chemistry
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Backbone Amide Linker Strategy: Protocols for the Synthesis of C-Terminal Peptide Aldehydes
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Synthesis of N-Methylated Peptides: On-Resin Methylation and Microwave-Assisted Couplings
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Synthesis of Antimicrobial Peptoids
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Synthesis of Lipidated Peptides
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Solid-Phase Synthesis of Phosphopeptides
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Synthesis of O -Glycopeptides and Construction of Glycopeptide Microarrays
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Instruments for Automated Peptide Synthesis
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Microwave-Assisted Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis Using the Biotage Syro Wave ™
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Microwave-Assisted Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis Based on the Fmoc Protecting Group Strategy (CEM)
Attention for Chapter 7: Preparation of C-terminally Modified Chemokines by Expressed Protein Ligation.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Preparation of C-terminally Modified Chemokines by Expressed Protein Ligation.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Peptide Synthesis and Applications
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-544-6_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-543-9, 978-1-62703-544-6
Authors

Baumann L, Steinhagen M, Beck-Sickinger AG, Lars Baumann, Max Steinhagen, Annette G. Beck-Sickinger, Baumann, Lars, Steinhagen, Max, Beck-Sickinger, Annette G.

Abstract

In order to link structural features on a molecular level to the function of chemokines, site-specific modification strategies are strongly required. These can be used to incorporate fluorescent dyes and/or physical probes to allow investigations in a wide range of biological and physical techniques, e.g., nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, fluorescence microscopy, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), or fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS). Only a limited number of functional groups within the 20 canonical amino acids allow ligation strategies that can be helpful to introduce novel functionalities, which in turn expand the scope of chemoselective and orthogonal reactivity of (semi)synthetic chemokines. In the present chapter we mainly focus on the fabulous history of native chemical ligation (NCL) and provide a general protocol for the preparation of C-terminally modified SDF-1α including tips and tricks for practical work. We believe that this protocol can be easily adapted to other chemokines and many proteins in general.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,343,746
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,853
of 13,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,949
of 175,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#31
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.